ENVRIplus Science Demonstrator evaluator (D9.4)

Total records in survey : 1

Results
Number of records in this query:1
Total records in survey:1
Percentage of total:100.00%
Summary for PROFROLE20190423
What is your professional role? Tick all that apply.
Answer Count Percentage
Administrator (project leader) (SQ001) 0 0.00%  
Data manager (SQ002) 0 0.00%  
System architect (SQ003) 0 0.00%  
Programmer or developer (SQ004) 1 100.00%  
Researcher (SQ005) 0 0.00%  
Other 0 0.00%  

Summary for SCIDEMO181011
Please select the Science Demonstrator you are evaluating:
Answer Count Percentage
SD1: Support EISCAT_3D Users to Reprocess Data Using User’s Algorithms (A1) 0 0.00%  
SD2: The Eddy Covariance Fluxes of GHGs (A2) 0 0.00%  
SD3: SOS & SSN Ontology Based Data Acquisition & Near Real Time Quality Control (A3) 1 100.00%  
SD4: EuroArgo Data Subscription Service (A4) 0 0.00%  
SD5: Sensor Registry (A5) 0 0.00%  
SD6: New particle formation event analysis on interoperable infrastructure (A6) 0 0.00%  
SD7: gCube-based VRE for Mosquito Diseases Study (A7) 0 0.00%  
SD8: Dynamic Ecological Information System - Site and Dataset Registry (A8) 0 0.00%  
SD9: PROV-Template Registry and Expansion Service (A9) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for MAINREASON181030
What is the main reason for you to evaluate this science demonstrator?
Answer Count Percentage
to see if it could be of general interest to my organisation (A1) 0 0.00%  
to investigate if it addresses a specific issue/need (A2) 0 0.00%  
to learn more about the technologies involved (A3) 1 100.00%  
not sure (A4) 0 0.00%  
Other 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for LEARNABOUT190423
How did you learn about the demonstrator you are evaluating?
Answer Count Percentage
Read about it in the ENVRIplus WP9 deliverable 9.2 (A1) 1 100.00%  
Heard a presentation at a ENVRI Week meeting (A2) 0 0.00%  
Saw it mentioned on the ENVRIplus website (A3) 0 0.00%  
It was mentioned on social media (A4) 0 0.00%  
A colleague told me about it (A5) 0 0.00%  
Other 0 0.00%  

Summary for WIKIREAD190424
Have you read the ENVRI Community wiki description of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 1 100.00%  
No (A2) 0 0.00%  
Don't know (A3) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for YOUTUBEWATCH190424
Did you watch the YouTube video describing the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 1 100.00%  
No (A2) 0 0.00%  
Don't know (A3) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for DOCUOTHER190425
What forms of documentation should be made available for this type of service?
Answer Count Percentage
Printable manual(s), e.g. in PDF or Word (SQ001) 1 100.00%  
Wiki-type online manual(s) (SQ002) 1 100.00%  
Topic-specific help built into the service or app (SQ003) 1 100.00%  
Introductory YouTube video (SQ004) 0 0.00%  
Webinars (accessible as recordings) (SQ005) 0 0.00%  
Other 0 0.00%  

Summary for LIVETEST190425
What are your experiences of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
I installed a local instance (SQ001) 0 0.00%  
I used a centrally hosted instance (SQ002) 0 0.00%  
I took part in a live demonstration (SQ003) 0 0.00%  
I read the documentation (SQ004) 1 100.00%  
I have communicated with the developers (SQ005) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (SQ006) 0 0.00%  
Other 0 0.00%  

Summary for MAINOBJECTIVE181017
What is your impression of the fields of application of the service?  
Answer Count Percentage
Acquisition of observational data (A1) 1 100.00%  
Curation and publishing of data (repository or archive) (A2) 0 0.00%  
Facilitating data dissemination (data portal tool) (A3) 0 0.00%  
Managing metadata (cataloguing, PID assignment, provenance collection,...) (A4) 1 100.00%  
Data processing for internal RI use (A5) 1 100.00%  
Supporting RI-external scientific end users in their data processing (A6) 0 0.00%  
Providing a computational platform (for modellers) (A7) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A8) 0 0.00%  
Other 0 0.00%  

Summary for EXPECT190605
Did the service meet your expectations (compared to how you interpreted its name)?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes (A1) 1 100.00%  
No (A2) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I prefer not to say (A3) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for TARGETGROUP181017
Which user groups do you believe can benefit from this service?
Answer Count Percentage
Researchers (domain specialists) (SQ004) 0 0.00%  
Researchers (from another scientific domain) (SQ003) 0 0.00%  
Data managers or curators (SQ005) 1 100.00%  
Software developers (SQ001) 0 0.00%  
IT resource experts (storage, computation etc.) (SQ002) 1 100.00%  
General public (SQ006) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (SQ007) 0 0.00%  
Other 0 0.00%  

Summary for MATURITY181017
How would you rate the maturity of this service? 
Answer Count Percentage
TRL 1 – basic principles observed (A1) 0 0.00%  
TRL 2 – technology concept formulated (A2) 0 0.00%  
TRL 3 – experimental proof of concept (A3) 1 100.00%  
TRL 4 – technology validated in lab (A4) 0 0.00%  
TRL 5 – technology validated in relevant environment (industrially relevant environment in the case of key enabling technologies) (A5) 0 0.00%  
TRL 6 – technology demonstrated in relevant environment (industrially relevant environment in the case of key enabling technologies) (A6) 0 0.00%  
TRL 7 – system prototype demonstration in operational environment (A7) 0 0.00%  
TRL 8 – system complete and qualified (A8) 0 0.00%  
TRL 9 – actual system proven in operational environment (competitive manufacturing in the case of key enabling technologies; or in space) (A9) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A10) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for IMPACT190624
How would you rate the potential impact on the ENVRI Community of this service in its current state?
Answer Count Percentage
Very high - it is already very useful (A1) 0 0.00%  
High - the concept is very good, and development should be continued (A2) 0 0.00%  
Medium - it will solve some issues (A3) 1 100.00%  
Low - there are other service options available already now (A4) 0 0.00%  
Very low - the addressed issue is no longer interesting (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for IMPACTEXT190624
How would you rate the potential impact on non-ENVRI infrastructures of this service in its current state?
Answer Count Percentage
Very high - it is already very useful (A1) 0 0.00%  
High - the concept is very good, and development should be continued (A2) 0 0.00%  
Medium - it will solve some issues (A3) 0 0.00%  
Low - there are other service options available already now (A4) 1 100.00%  
Very low - the addressed issue is no longer interesting (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for LIFECYCLE190625
Which of the research data lifecycle steps are addressed by the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Acquisition (SQ001) 0 0.00%  
Curation (SQ002) 1 100.00%  
Publishing (SQ003) 0 0.00%  
Processing (SQ004) 0 0.00%  
Use (SQ005) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (SQ006) 0 0.00%  

Summary for PILLARS190625
Which of the following research data management topics are involved in the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Cataloguing (SQ001) 0 0.00%  
Curation (SQ002) 1 100.00%  
Identification & citation (SQ003) 0 0.00%  
Optimization (SQ004) 0 0.00%  
Processing (SQ005) 1 100.00%  
Provenance (SQ006) 0 0.00%  
Architecture design (SQ007) 0 0.00%  
Meta-information linking (SQ008) 1 100.00%  
Common reference model (SQ009) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (SQ010) 0 0.00%  

Summary for USERLEVEL181017
What user experience level is needed to use this service?
Answer Count Percentage
Researcher (A1) 0 0.00%  
Domain specialist (A2) 0 0.00%  
Data manager (A3) 0 0.00%  
Developer (A4) 1 100.00%  
Other 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for TRAIN181017
What kind training or instruction is needed to use this service?
Answer Count Percentage
FAQ (SQ001) 1 100.00%  
Web based training (SQ002) 0 0.00%  
Seminars (SQ003) 0 0.00%  
Manuals in PDF (SQ004) 1 100.00%  
Other (SQ005) 0 0.00%  
None (SQ006) 0 0.00%  

Summary for TECHNEEDS190624
In your opinion, does operating the service require access to specific data centers or technologies?
Answer Count Percentage
Yes,specialized technologies only available at specific data centers, are required (A1) 0 0.00%  
Partly, specialized technologies are needed, but these are available at many data centers (A2) 0 0.00%  
Partly, no specialized technologies are required, but only some data centers would operate the service (A3) 1 100.00%  
No, no special technologies are needed and the service can be operated at any data center (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for TECHRATE190626(SQ001)[Access requirements (need for users to register)]
How do you rate the state of the following technical aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 1 100.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for TECHRATE190626(SQ002)[Authentication methods (via user accounts, social network logins etc.)]
How do you rate the state of the following technical aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 1 100.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for TECHRATE190626(SQ003)[Portability (avoiding lock-in to a specific technology or platform)]
How do you rate the state of the following technical aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A4) 1 100.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for TECHRATE190626(SQ004)[Choice of programming language(s)]
How do you rate the state of the following technical aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A4) 1 100.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for TECHRATE190626(SQ005)[Ability for integration with other services]
How do you rate the state of the following technical aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 1 100.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for TECHRATE190626(SQ006)[Reliability of used external e-services (storage, computation)]
How do you rate the state of the following technical aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 1 100.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for INTERFACERATE190626(SQ001)[Accessibility (support for e.g. visually impaired)]
How do you rate the state of the following user interface aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 1 100.00%  
Good (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for INTERFACERATE190626(SQ002)[Data input (available methods, allowed formats etc.)]
How do you rate the state of the following user interface aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 1 100.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for INTERFACERATE190626(SQ003)[Data output (available methods, allowed formats etc.)]
How do you rate the state of the following user interface aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 1 100.00%  
Good (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for INTERFACERATE190626(SQ004)[Graphical User Interface (design, functionality)]
How do you rate the state of the following user interface aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 1 100.00%  
Good (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for INTERFACERATE190626(SQ005)[Command-line user interface (functionality)]
How do you rate the state of the following user interface aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 1 100.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for INTERFACERATE190626(SQ006)[Application Programming Interface (functionality)]
How do you rate the state of the following user interface aspects of the service?
Answer Count Percentage
Very poor (A1) 0 0.00%  
Poor (A2) 0 0.00%  
Good (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Not applicable (A5) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A6) 1 100.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for SUSTAIN190624(SQ001)[Continued development efforts by the original RI team]
Please rate the sustainability of the service, concerning the following aspects:
Answer Count Percentage
Very unlikely (A1) 0 0.00%  
Unlikely (A2) 0 0.00%  
Likely (A3) 1 100.00%  
Very likely (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for SUSTAIN190624(SQ002)[Adoption of development efforts by the ENVRI community]
Please rate the sustainability of the service, concerning the following aspects:
Answer Count Percentage
Very unlikely (A1) 0 0.00%  
Unlikely (A2) 1 100.00%  
Likely (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very likely (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for SUSTAIN190624(SQ003)[Pick-up by Open Source community developers]
Please rate the sustainability of the service, concerning the following aspects:
Answer Count Percentage
Very unlikely (A1) 0 0.00%  
Unlikely (A2) 0 0.00%  
Likely (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very likely (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 1 100.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for SUSTAIN190624(SQ004)[Maintenance & availability of the current version]
Please rate the sustainability of the service, concerning the following aspects:
Answer Count Percentage
Very unlikely (A1) 0 0.00%  
Unlikely (A2) 0 0.00%  
Likely (A3) 1 100.00%  
Very likely (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for SUSTAIN190624(SQ005)[Software platform & operating system used by current service version]
Please rate the sustainability of the service, concerning the following aspects:
Answer Count Percentage
Very unlikely (A1) 0 0.00%  
Unlikely (A2) 0 0.00%  
Likely (A3) 1 100.00%  
Very likely (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for SUSTAIN190624(SQ006)[Hardware platform used by current service version]
Please rate the sustainability of the service, concerning the following aspects:
Answer Count Percentage
Very unlikely (A1) 0 0.00%  
Unlikely (A2) 0 0.00%  
Likely (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very likely (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 1 100.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for SUSTAIN190624(SQ007)[General e-services (storage, networking, ...) used by current version]
Please rate the sustainability of the service, concerning the following aspects:
Answer Count Percentage
Very unlikely (A1) 0 0.00%  
Unlikely (A2) 0 0.00%  
Likely (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very likely (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 1 100.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for SUSTAIN190624(SQ008)[Continued availability of assistance from relevant ICT experts]
Please rate the sustainability of the service, concerning the following aspects:
Answer Count Percentage
Very unlikely (A1) 0 0.00%  
Unlikely (A2) 0 0.00%  
Likely (A3) 0 0.00%  
Very likely (A4) 0 0.00%  
I don't know/I'd rather not say (A5) 1 100.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for EVALDESIGNARR190421(SQ002)[Web page design & layout]
Please let us know what your impressions are of the following aspects of the service evaluator tool!
Answer Count Percentage
Very bad (A1) 0 0.00%  
Bad (A2) 0 0.00%  
OK (A3) 0 0.00%  
Good (A4) 1 100.00%  
Very good (A5) 0 0.00%  
Don't know (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for EVALDESIGNARR190421(SQ003)[Scope (topics & aspects covered)]
Please let us know what your impressions are of the following aspects of the service evaluator tool!
Answer Count Percentage
Very bad (A1) 0 0.00%  
Bad (A2) 0 0.00%  
OK (A3) 1 100.00%  
Good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A5) 0 0.00%  
Don't know (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for EVALDESIGNARR190421(SQ004)[Question grouping]
Please let us know what your impressions are of the following aspects of the service evaluator tool!
Answer Count Percentage
Very bad (A1) 0 0.00%  
Bad (A2) 0 0.00%  
OK (A3) 0 0.00%  
Good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A5) 0 0.00%  
Don't know (A6) 1 100.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for EVALDESIGNARR190421(SQ007)[Clarity of questions & answer options]
Please let us know what your impressions are of the following aspects of the service evaluator tool!
Answer Count Percentage
Very bad (A1) 0 0.00%  
Bad (A2) 0 0.00%  
OK (A3) 1 100.00%  
Good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A5) 0 0.00%  
Don't know (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for EVALDESIGNARR190421(SQ001)[User friendliness]
Please let us know what your impressions are of the following aspects of the service evaluator tool!
Answer Count Percentage
Very bad (A1) 0 0.00%  
Bad (A2) 0 0.00%  
OK (A3) 1 100.00%  
Good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A5) 0 0.00%  
Don't know (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%  

Summary for EVALDESIGNARR190421(SQ005)[Relevance for service developers]
Please let us know what your impressions are of the following aspects of the service evaluator tool!
Answer Count Percentage
Very bad (A1) 0 0.00%  
Bad (A2) 1 100.00%  
OK (A3) 0 0.00%  
Good (A4) 0 0.00%  
Very good (A5) 0 0.00%  
Don't know (A6) 0 0.00%  
No answer 0 0.00%  
Not completed or Not displayed 0 0.00%